From Appearance this Grace Kelly aka saintcumudgeon has no idea of
Federal Title 26 501(c)3 non profit m--- Kelly wrote:
FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code
> I find it outrageous to be worried about government
> lists of information I publicly gave,
FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code
Really?
You signed a waiver saying "this information, which
EVERYONE ELSE ASSUMES is private, I hereby release for
Mark Ritchie to use in any ol' way he pleases?"
I didn't even know that was an option! Not that I'd
have signed it.
So let me get this straight; you want to let Mark
Ritchie pick and choose the laws that he obeys?
The following is a bit outside the MNPOL charter, but
what the heck, nobody enforces anything here anyway,
so...:
> when we know
> that our federal government currently searches
> through all of our emails
Thank you, Bill Clinton!
> and searches through all
> of our phone calls.
Untrue, unless you're getting calls from Waziristan.
> Every thing on do on a computer
> is hacked and mined by both private interests and
> the federal government.
So again - because of what are troubling allegations
(to libertarians like me) and (in many cases) raving
lunatic conspiracy theories, you (pl) think it's now
OK for Mark Ritchie to pick and choose the laws he
wants to obey?
Because that's really the only Minnesota topic here.
> I hate that what I buy on a
> credit card is considered public information to be
> sold by that company.
Easy! Live on cash!
>This whole thing is fussing about a little
> thing
Rubbish.
If it had been Mary Kiffmeyer, y'all would have been
picketing in front of the DoS demanding her head on a
pike.
Hell, you people pilloried Kiffmeyer (a VASTLY more
capable public servant than Ritchie) over matters of
*opinion*, not law.
Here, Ritchie appears to have *violated the law* in
its most objective sense.
Does that mean anything to you people? Or only when
it's the GOP?
Mitch Berg
The Midway
Who will await the flood of ad-homina that never
really address the actual issue.
mission statement
> I find it outrageous to be worried about government
> lists of information I publicly gave,
FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code
Really?
You signed a waiver saying "this information, which
EVERYONE ELSE ASSUMES is private, I hereby release for
Mark Ritchie to use in any ol' way he pleases?"
I didn't even know that was an option! Not that I'd
have signed it.
So let me get this straight; you want to let Mark
Ritchie pick and choose the laws that he obeys?
The following is a bit outside the MNPOL charter, but
what the heck, nobody enforces anything here anyway,
so...:
> when we know
> that our federal government currently searches
> through all of our emails
Thank you, Bill Clinton!
> and searches through all
> of our phone calls.
Untrue, unless you're getting calls from Waziristan.
> Every thing on do on a computer
> is hacked and mined by both private interests and
> the federal government.
So again - because of what are troubling allegations
(to libertarians like me) and (in many cases) raving
lunatic conspiracy theories, you (pl) think it's now
OK for Mark Ritchie to pick and choose the laws he
wants to obey?
Because that's really the only Minnesota topic here.
> I hate that what I buy on a
> credit card is considered public information to be
> sold by that company.
Easy! Live on cash!
>This whole thing is fussing about a little
> thing
Rubbish.
If it had been Mary Kiffmeyer, y'all would have been
picketing in front of the DoS demanding her head on a
pike.
Hell, you people pilloried Kiffmeyer (a VASTLY more
capable public servant than Ritchie) over matters of
*opinion*, not law.
Here, Ritchie appears to have *violated the law* in
its most objective sense.
Does that mean anything to you people? Or only when
it's the GOP?
Mitch Berg
The Midway
Who will await the flood of ad-homina that never
really address the actual issue.
mission statement
Forwarded Message:
| ||||||||||||
Legal Notice dtd. 25Nov07
Sharon Anderson is still demanding alol Records,findings of facts
conclusions of E Democracy to the 3 yr Sanction to Libel with
Malice Candidatates for public office.
Therefore a FOIA is pulled on you personally to resolve these matters
http://sharon4council.blogspot.com/ over 60 blogs of forensic evidence.
HEY GIRL GET WITH THE HIGH TECH WHO ELSE HAVE YOU WITH MAILICE SLANDERED?
"I find it outrageous to be worried about government lists of information I publicly gave, when we know that our federal government currently searches through all of our emails and searches through all of our phone calls. Every thing on do on a computer is hacked and mined by both private interests and the federal government. I hate that what I buy on a credit card is considered public information to be sold by that company. I can't even get a company that I do business with to stop sending me big catalogs. This whole thing is fussing about a little thing when all of our data has become a commodity publically traded."
Grace Kelly nicknamed Kelly
St Paul, MN
Grace (nicknamed Kelly) Kelly
Merriam Park, St Paul
Info about Grace Kelly (nicknamed Kelly): http://forums.e-democracy.org/contacts/gracekelly
This topic's messages may be viewed at: http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/7qQswamKQ1MiTgYlv3Dyjg
-----------------------------------------
To post, send your message to: mn-politics@forums.e-democracy.org
To leave or for daily digest, type "unsubscribe" or "digest on,"
in subject line and send to: mn-politics@forums.e-democracy.org
More info about Minnesota Politics and Issues Forum:
http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/mn-politics
E-Democracy.Org rules: http://e-democracy.org/rules
-----------------------------------------
Technical assistance thanks to our friends at http://OnlineGroups
Grace Kelly nicknamed Kelly
St Paul, MN
Grace (nicknamed Kelly) Kelly
Merriam Park, St Paul
Info about Grace Kelly (nicknamed Kelly): http://forums.e-democracy.org/contacts/gracekelly
This topic's messages may be viewed at: http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/7qQswamKQ1MiTgYlv3Dyjg
-----------------------------------------
To post, send your message to: mn-politics@forums.e-democracy.org
To leave or for daily digest, type "unsubscribe" or "digest on,"
in subject line and send to: mn-politics@forums.e-democracy.org
More info about Minnesota Politics and Issues Forum:
http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/mn-politics
E-Democracy.Org rules: http://e-democracy.org/rules
-----------------------------------------
Technical assistance thanks to our friends at http://OnlineGroups
Candidate Profile FCC Complaints - Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - Google Search BlogItBabe2007
Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA-Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Document's are based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, press releases, and knowledge gained as financial journalists, Private Attorney Generals, Candidates for Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on theseSHARON-MN-ECF: Judges-Greylord-Libby-Guilty LUFSKY Scap129FAnokaP2697(1976) Cpl James R. Anderson USMC 11022885 Bio for Sharon Anderson , TAKING DL_AOL Journal Legal Eagle SharonAnderson 1 Journalism Ethics Blogger: 1986 Petition Jane Duchene MN Bull SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - Buzznet Sharon'sFedCases1973to2006_13pdf Anderson + Advocates http://www.sharonanderson.org/ http://www.sharon4anderson.org/
Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA-Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Document's are based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, press releases, and knowledge gained as financial journalists, Private Attorney Generals, Candidates for Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on theseSHARON-MN-ECF: Judges-Greylord-Libby-Guilty LUFSKY Scap129FAnokaP2697(1976) Cpl James R. Anderson USMC 11022885 Bio for Sharon Anderson , TAKING DL_AOL Journal Legal Eagle SharonAnderson 1 Journalism Ethics Blogger: 1986 Petition Jane Duchene MN Bull SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - Buzznet Sharon'sFedCases1973to2006_13pdf Anderson + Advocates http://www.sharonanderson.org/ http://www.sharon4anderson.org/
