by "Banning" Forensic Files of Evidence, even to a Warning on this Blog.
http://www.slideshare.net/sharon4anderson
http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/file41shar-thune-22-presentation
Jt Memoof Law Support Mo… 2 years ago, 484 views
From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
To: support@e-democracy.org
CC: rcbarden@mac.com, tim@e-democracy.org
Sent: 9/1/2010 8:53:57 A.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Candidates Complaint Sharon Anderson v. Rick Mons
http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/mn-politics/messages/topic/csZex8Ul9GBj7OMnmNlo2 SHARON4MNAG NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS_CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT, CONTRARY TO TITLE 26 501(C)3
www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
From: Rick Mons Date: Aug 10 02:41 UTC Short link
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Dennis Hill> wrote:
> St, Paul's very own Bill Dahn is running uncontested for State Attorney
> General
> office under the the Independence Party banner? Can't wait to see Horner
> and
> Dahn sharing the party label through the general election.
>
A better image would be Sharon Anderson beating Chris Barden for the GOP
nomination and having both Dahn and Anderson running against Lori Swanson.
Emmer and Horner could commiserate over having two non-attorney perennial
candidates on the ticket.
BTW, MPR is reporting that the State GOP folks are embarking on a GOTV
campaign to avoid Anderson repeating her 1994 primary victory:
"With low turnout expected, Minnesota Republican Party Chairman Tony Sutton
says he's concerned frequent candidate Sharon Anderson could beat Barden, in
a repeat of her 1994 upset of Tom Neuville in a primary contest for the same
office. ( http://bit.ly/ciT9RF )
Frankly, I think Barden is a candidate who is just one step (albeit a small
one) better than his primary opponent. His rants on "Obamacare," the need
for a "pro-business" Attorney General and his pronouncements on other issues
make him about the same as Anderson. His one redeeming virtue: at least he
has a law degree.
From: Dave Shove Date: Aug 10 03:38 UTC
Subject: | Fwd: Candidates Complaint Sharon Anderson 4MNAG v. Rick Mons E-DEM |
Date: | 9/1/2010 9:09:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time |
From: | Sharon4Anderson@aol.com |
|
http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/mn-politics/messages/topic/csZex8Ul9GBj7OMnmNlo2 SHARON4MNAG NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS_CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT, CONTRARY TO TITLE 26 501(C)3
www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
From: Rick Mons Date: Aug 10 02:41 UTC Short link
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Dennis Hill> wrote:
> St, Paul's very own Bill Dahn is running uncontested for State Attorney
> General
> office under the the Independence Party banner? Can't wait to see Horner
> and
> Dahn sharing the party label through the general election.
>
A better image would be Sharon Anderson beating Chris Barden for the GOP
nomination and having both Dahn and Anderson running against Lori Swanson.
Emmer and Horner could commiserate over having two non-attorney perennial
candidates on the ticket.
BTW, MPR is reporting that the State GOP folks are embarking on a GOTV
campaign to avoid Anderson repeating her 1994 primary victory:
"With low turnout expected, Minnesota Republican Party Chairman Tony Sutton
says he's concerned frequent candidate Sharon Anderson could beat Barden, in
a repeat of her 1994 upset of Tom Neuville in a primary contest for the same
office. ( http://bit.ly/ciT9RF )
Frankly, I think Barden is a candidate who is just one step (albeit a small
one) better than his primary opponent. His rants on "Obamacare," the need
for a "pro-business" Attorney General and his pronouncements on other issues
make him about the same as Anderson. His one redeeming virtue: at least he
has a law degree.
From: Dave Shove Date: Aug 10 03:38 UTC