Wed 1Sept2010
TO: STATE COMMERCE AND REVENUE Hon. Glen Wilson and Ward Einess: Prennial Candidate SharonScarrella Anderson 4 MNAG et al
HEREBY: Brings to the State and Federal Officials the apparent violations of the non-profit known as http://www.e-democracy.org/.
FOR : The past 3 years this Blog with Blandin Grant of $50 thous has consistently maligned political candidates who are not with the DFL Party.
Pursuant to Title 26 501(c)3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_Revenue_Code Sharon4MNAG did just Fine in the 2010 Primary for State Attorney General, http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/ has announced either her St.Paul City Council or Mayoral Run to estopp the Corruption in the City of St.Paul.
http://www.sharon-e-dem.blogspot.com/ Blog's Warning must be addressed by apparantly FCC and Complaints against Rick Mons.
http://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdf
From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
To: support@e-democracy.org
CC: rcbarden@mac.com, tim@e-democracy.org
Sent: 9/1/2010 8:53:57 A.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Candidates Complaint Sharon Anderson v. Rick Mons
Wed. 1Sept2010
To Whom it may concern: http://www.e-democracy.org/
Apparantly Rick Mons who lives in Shoreview, yet "Controlls"
the St.Paul Forumn,
has "BANNED" the undersigned Political Candidate yet with Libel and malice speaks "ILL" of political persons.
Candidate Sharon Scarrella Anderson hereby makes this Criminal Complaint against Rick Mons who has used "undue DFL influence" in the non profit http://www.e-democracy.org/.
Please clarify this matter to run down Sharon Anderson a St.Paul Resident, but to malign her Republican Opponent who is a licensed psychologist is repugnant.
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
RickMons heinous Title 26 501(c)3 violations
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Dennis Hill> wrote:
> St, Paul's very own Bill Dahn is running uncontested for State Attorney
> General
> office under the the Independence Party banner? Can't wait to see Horner
> and
> Dahn sharing the party label through the general election.
>
A better image would be Sharon Anderson beating Chris Barden for the GOP
nomination and having both Dahn and Anderson running against Lori Swanson.
Emmer and Horner could commiserate over having two non-attorney perennial
candidates on the ticket.
BTW, MPR is reporting that the State GOP folks are embarking on a GOTV
campaign to avoid Anderson repeating her 1994 primary victory:
"With low turnout expected, Minnesota Republican Party Chairman Tony Sutton
says he's concerned frequent candidate Sharon Anderson could beat Barden, in
a repeat of her 1994 upset of Tom Neuville in a primary contest for the same
office. ( http://bit.ly/ciT9RF )
Frankly, I think Barden is a candidate who is just one step (albeit a small
one) better than his primary opponent. His rants on "Obamacare," the need
for a "pro-business" Attorney General and his pronouncements on other issues
make him about the same as Anderson. His one redeeming virtue: at least he
has a law degree.
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Homestead Act of 1862 neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are makinknowledge gained as financial journalists , securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in g such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26
The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com
| Subject: | Fwd: Candidates Complaint Sharon Anderson 4MNAG v. Rick Mons E-DEM |
| Date: | 9/1/2010 9:09:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time |
| From: | |
|
| |
